An investigator wishes to study the relation between dogmatism and anthrocentrism. He uses a well-established measure of anthrocentrism and constructs an instrument to measure dogmatism. The correlation between dogmatism and anthrocentrism is 0.60. The investigator does not stop there. However, because it seems to him that the correlation may be due to factors other than those he is trying to measure, he is particularly dubious about the dogmatism measure. What should he do to obtain evidence that his dogmatism measure is really measuring dogmatism? Pay particular attention to construct validity and construct validation.
To obtain evidence that his dogmatism measure is really measuring dogmatism , the investigator needs to focus on construct validation , which is the process of gathering evidence to support that a test measures the intended theoretical construct —in this case, dogmatism . 🔍 Why the Concern? The investigator is wisely questioning whether the observed correlation (r = 0.60) between dogmatism and anthrocentrism might be due to confounding factors , measurement error , or that the dogmatism scale is not valid . This skepticism is essential in construct validation . ✅ Steps to Strengthen Construct Validity of the Dogmatism Measure: 1. Content Validity Action : Involve multiple subject matter experts to review the test items to ensure they cover all relevant facets of dogmatism (e.g., rigidity of belief, resistance to change, intolerance of ambiguity). Purpose : Ensures the scale has comprehensive and representative content. 2. Convergent Validity Action : Corre...