Study the following assertions and decide, in each case, whether the assertion refers to reliability or validity, or both. Label the type of reliability and validity. The test was given twice to the same group. The coefficient of correlation between the scores of the two administrations was 0.90. Four teachers studied the items of the test for their relevance to the objectives of the curriculum. The items seemed to be a good sample of the item universe. Between a test of academic aptitude and grade point averages, R is equal to 0.55. The mean difference between Republicans and Democrats on conservatism instruments was highly significant.
Here's a detailed analysis of each assertion, identifying whether it refers to reliability, validity, or both, and specifying the type of each:
1. "The test was given twice to the same group. The coefficient of correlation between the scores of the two administrations was 0.90."
-
Refers to: Reliability
-
Type: Test–retest reliability
-
Explanation:
This describes the consistency of the test over time. A correlation coefficient of 0.90 indicates very high temporal stability of the test scores.
2. "Four teachers studied the items of the test for their relevance to the objectives of the curriculum. The items seemed to be a good sample of the item universe."
-
Refers to: Validity
-
Type: Content validity
-
Explanation:
This reflects expert judgment about whether the test items adequately represent the curriculum objectives and the full domain of content (the "item universe").
3. "Between a test of academic aptitude and grade point averages, R is equal to 0.55."
-
Refers to: Validity
-
Type: Criterion-related validity (specifically, predictive validity)
-
Explanation:
The correlation (R = 0.55) between an aptitude test and GPA shows how well the test predicts future academic performance, which is an example of predictive validity.
4. "The mean difference between Republicans and Democrats on conservatism instruments was highly significant."
-
Refers to: Validity
-
Type: Construct validity (specifically, known-groups validity or discriminant validity)
-
Explanation:
This tests whether the instrument can distinguish between groups known to differ on the construct (in this case, political ideology). Significant differences support the validity of the instrument.
✅ Summary Table
Assertion | Refers to | Type |
---|---|---|
1. Test given twice, r = 0.90 | Reliability | Test–retest reliability |
2. Teachers judged item relevance | Validity | Content validity |
3. Aptitude test vs GPA, r = 0.55 | Validity | Predictive (criterion-related) validity |
4. Group differences (Republicans vs Democrats) | Validity | Construct validity (known-groups/discriminant) |
Comments
Post a Comment