Structured Q-Sort: Internal vs. External Example
Structured Q-Sort: Internal vs. External Example
A structured Q-sort involves organizing your Q-set (statements) deliberately along known theoretical or conceptual dimensions. One simple and classic structure is based on locus of control, such as:
· Internal Control: The belief that outcomes are determined by one’s own actions, responsibility, or effort.
· External Control: The belief that outcomes are controlled by outside forces — luck, fate, others, or institutions.
What This Means
In this simplest form, half the items in the Q-set reflect Internal Control, and the other half reflect External Control. This allows the researcher to:
· Predefine the structure based on theory (Rotter’s Locus of Control, for example).
· Test if participants lean more toward internal or external beliefs in a particular context (e.g., investment success, career, learning outcomes).
Example: Structured Q-Sort in Finance
Topic: “Beliefs about Financial Success among Young
Adults”
Q-Set Composition: 20 Statements (10 Internal, 10 External)
Internal Control Statements |
"I succeed in investing because I do my own
research." |
"Consistent saving habits lead to wealth
creation." |
"Financial outcomes depend on one’s knowledge
and discipline." |
"I can manage risks if I plan properly." |
"Smart investment choices are made through
personal judgment." |
External Control Statements |
"Stock market performance is pure luck." |
"Only people with insider access make money in
investing." |
"The government decides whether we gain or lose
financially." |
"Banks and institutions control the fate of
small investors." |
"Rising inflation and global trends make
personal planning useless." |
Result (Structured Q-Sort Purpose)
Using a structured Q-sort like this allows you to test predefined constructs:
· Are most participants inclined toward internal locus of control (self-responsibility)?
· Or do they exhibit an external control orientation (belief in outside forces)?
This is ideal for confirmatory research or studies validating psychological or behavioral models.
Structured vs. Unstructured Q-Sort: Comparison Table
Feature |
Structured Q-Sort |
Unstructured Q-Sort |
Basis of Statement Design |
Guided by theory or conceptual framework |
Based on real-world discourse, media, interviews |
Predefined Dimensions |
Yes (e.g., Internal/External, Risk-Seeking/Averse) |
No (factors emerge after Q-sorting) |
Purpose |
To confirm or test existing theory |
To explore and discover unknown viewpoints |
Analysis Focus |
Compare views along known variables |
Identify emergent factors (clusters of thought) |
Example Fields |
Psychology (e.g., locus of control), behavior models |
Social attitudes, public opinion, market perception |
Q-set Creation |
Balanced or proportioned to reflect categories |
Open-ended, can include contradictory or emotional
statements |
When to Use Which?
Use Structured Q-Sort when: |
You want to test a hypothesis or theory |
Your research relies on construct validation |
You need to compare responses along known axes |
Use Unstructured Q-Sort when: |
You are exploring new or
under-researched topics |
You're trying to discover
latent viewpoints |
You aim to capture real-world
diversity of thought |
Summary
A structured Q-sort is like giving respondents a set of ideas arranged around a known framework (e.g., internal vs. external control), whereas an unstructured Q-sort offers a set of freely gathered ideas and lets the structure emerge from the participants' sorting behavior.
Comments
Post a Comment