Semantic Differential: Concepts and Scales
1. Concept of Semantic Differential
The Semantic Differential (SD) is a type of attitudinal scaling technique used to assess people’s subjective feelings or attitudes toward a particular concept, object, service, person, event, or institution. It measures connotative meaning—how people emotionally or cognitively evaluate the concept.
Developed by Charles E. Osgood, the SD is based on the theory that every concept has three universal dimensions of meaning:
1. Evaluation (Good–Bad)
2. Potency (Strong–Weak)
3. Activity (Active–Passive)
2. Core Components / Concepts in SD
|
Component |
Description |
|
Concept |
The item or object being evaluated (e.g.,
"Stock Market", "Bank", "Mutual Fund") |
|
Bipolar Adjectives |
Pairs of opposite adjectives (e.g., trustworthy–untrustworthy, safe–risky) |
|
Scale (Continuum) |
A linear rating scale where respondents mark their
attitude between two ends |
|
Respondent’s Judgment |
The subjective position chosen on the scale
indicating their perception |
3. Scales in Semantic Differential
The scale is typically a 7-point or 5-point rating scale placed between bipolar adjectives. It visually and numerically captures the intensity of the respondent's feelings.
Example of a 7-Point Scale:
Concept: Digital Banking Services
| Modern ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ Outdated |
· The respondent marks the ⬜ closest to their perception.
Scale Points (Numeric Labels):
Modern (1) — (2) — (3) — (4) — (5) — (6) — (7) Outdated
You can assign:
· 1–3 → Leaning toward the first adjective (e.g., “Modern”)
· 4 → Neutral
· 5–7 → Leaning toward the second adjective (e.g., “Outdated”)
Alternative: 5-Point Scale
Used when simpler differentiation is needed, especially with less variation.
4. Key Dimensions Measured in SD
|
Dimension |
Description |
Examples of Bipolar
Adjectives |
|
Evaluation |
Degree of goodness or value judgment |
Good–Bad, Valuable–Worthless, Trusted–Mistrusted |
|
Potency |
Strength or weakness of the concept |
Strong–Weak, Powerful–Powerless |
|
Activity |
Level of action, speed, or dynamism |
Active–Passive, Fast–Slow, Exciting–Dull |
5. Scoring and Interpretation
· Each point on the scale is assigned a score (e.g., 1 to 7).
· Mean scores for each adjective pair are calculated across respondents.
· Lower scores lean toward the positive/first adjective, higher toward the negative/second adjective.
· Scores can be visualized using profile charts, bar graphs, or even semantic space maps.
Sample in Finance Education Research
Concept: “Online Investment Platforms”
|
Attribute |
Scale |
|
Reliable – Unreliable |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
|
Easy to use – Difficult |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
|
Affordable – Expensive |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
|
Secure – Insecure |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
|
Innovative – Traditional |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
Respondents' choices will show how they perceive the usability, cost, and trust level of these platforms.
Summary Table: Concepts vs. Scales in SD
|
Element |
Concept or Scale? |
Purpose |
|
Bipolar adjective pair |
Concept |
Defines the evaluative dimension |
|
7-point Likert-type line |
Scale |
Captures the intensity of perception |
|
Respondent's mark on scale |
Scale |
Indicates subjective judgment on the concept |
|
Semantic space |
Concept |
A theoretical idea representing how concepts are
located based on perceptions |
|
Numerical coding |
Scale |
Enables quantitative analysis |
Comments
Post a Comment