Semantic Differential: Concepts and Scales

 

 1. Concept of Semantic Differential

The Semantic Differential (SD) is a type of attitudinal scaling technique used to assess people’s subjective feelings or attitudes toward a particular concept, object, service, person, event, or institution. It measures connotative meaning—how people emotionally or cognitively evaluate the concept.

Developed by Charles E. Osgood, the SD is based on the theory that every concept has three universal dimensions of meaning:

1.      Evaluation (Good–Bad)

2.      Potency (Strong–Weak)

3.      Activity (Active–Passive)

 2. Core Components / Concepts in SD

Component

Description

Concept

The item or object being evaluated (e.g., "Stock Market", "Bank", "Mutual Fund")

Bipolar Adjectives

Pairs of opposite adjectives (e.g., trustworthy–untrustworthy, safe–risky)

Scale (Continuum)

A linear rating scale where respondents mark their attitude between two ends

Respondent’s Judgment

The subjective position chosen on the scale indicating their perception

 3. Scales in Semantic Differential

The scale is typically a 7-point or 5-point rating scale placed between bipolar adjectives. It visually and numerically captures the intensity of the respondent's feelings.

 Example of a 7-Point Scale:

Concept: Digital Banking Services

| Modern ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ Outdated |

·         The respondent marks the ⬜ closest to their perception.

Scale Points (Numeric Labels):

Modern (1) — (2) — (3) — (4) — (5) — (6) — (7) Outdated

You can assign:

·         1–3 → Leaning toward the first adjective (e.g., “Modern”)

·         4 → Neutral

·         5–7 → Leaning toward the second adjective (e.g., “Outdated”)

Alternative: 5-Point Scale

Used when simpler differentiation is needed, especially with less variation.

 4. Key Dimensions Measured in SD

Dimension

Description

Examples of Bipolar Adjectives

Evaluation

Degree of goodness or value judgment

Good–Bad, Valuable–Worthless, Trusted–Mistrusted

Potency

Strength or weakness of the concept

Strong–Weak, Powerful–Powerless

Activity

Level of action, speed, or dynamism

Active–Passive, Fast–Slow, Exciting–Dull

 5. Scoring and Interpretation

·         Each point on the scale is assigned a score (e.g., 1 to 7).

·         Mean scores for each adjective pair are calculated across respondents.

·         Lower scores lean toward the positive/first adjective, higher toward the negative/second adjective.

·         Scores can be visualized using profile charts, bar graphs, or even semantic space maps.

 Sample in Finance Education Research

Concept: “Online Investment Platforms”

Attribute

Scale

Reliable – Unreliable

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Easy to use – Difficult

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Affordable – Expensive

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Secure – Insecure

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Innovative – Traditional

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Respondents' choices will show how they perceive the usability, cost, and trust level of these platforms.

 Summary Table: Concepts vs. Scales in SD

Element

Concept or Scale?

Purpose

Bipolar adjective pair

Concept

Defines the evaluative dimension

7-point Likert-type line

Scale

Captures the intensity of perception

Respondent's mark on scale

Scale

Indicates subjective judgment on the concept

Semantic space

Concept

A theoretical idea representing how concepts are located based on perceptions

Numerical coding

Scale

Enables quantitative analysis

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Two-Step System GMM (Generalized Method of Moments)

Shodhganaga vs Shodhgangotri

Panel Stationarity Tests: CADF and CIPS Explained