Non-Parametric Tests in Research
Definition:
Non-parametric tests are statistical tests that do not assume a specific
distribution (like normality) for the data. They are also known as distribution-free
tests, and are especially useful for ordinal data, nominal data,
or small sample sizes.
When to Use Non-Parametric Tests
Use non-parametric tests when:
- Data does
not meet assumptions of parametric tests (e.g., normality, equal
variances).
- The sample
size is small.
- The data
is ordinal or nominal.
- There are outliers
or skewed distributions.
- The
measurement scale is not interval or ratio.
Common Non-Parametric Tests
|
Test Name |
Purpose |
Parametric Equivalent |
Example |
|
Chi-Square Test (χ²) |
Tests association between categorical variables |
None |
Gender vs. Voting Preference |
|
Mann–Whitney U Test |
Compares two independent groups (ordinal/continuous) |
Independent t-test |
Comparing satisfaction levels of two customer groups |
|
Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test |
Compares two related samples or matched pairs |
Paired t-test |
Pre- and post-test scores of same participants |
|
Kruskal–Wallis Test |
Compares more than two independent groups |
One-way ANOVA |
Comparing ranks of test scores across 3 teaching methods |
|
Friedman Test |
Compares more than two related groups |
Repeated-measures ANOVA |
Measuring improvement in performance across 3 time points |
|
Spearman’s Rank Correlation |
Measures strength/direction of ordinal/monotonic relationships |
Pearson correlation |
Ranking income vs. happiness levels |
|
Kolmogorov–Smirnov Test |
Tests the distribution of a sample against a reference
distribution |
Normality test |
Testing if a sample follows normal distribution |
|
Run Test |
Tests randomness in a sequence |
— |
Checking randomness in a sequence of stock price changes |
Advantages of Non-Parametric Tests
- Do not
require assumptions about population parameters.
- Can be
used with ordinal, nominal, or non-normally distributed
interval data.
- Robust to
outliers and skewed data.
- Ideal for qualitative
and ranked data.
Disadvantages
- Generally less
powerful than parametric tests (higher chance of Type II error).
- Do not
provide parameter estimates (e.g., means, standard deviations).
- May
require larger sample sizes for detecting small effects.
Summary Table: Parametric vs. Non-Parametric
|
Feature |
Parametric Test |
Non-Parametric Test |
|
Data Type |
Interval/Ratio (Quantitative) |
Ordinal/Nominal/Non-Normal |
|
Assumption of Normality |
Required |
Not required |
|
Example Tests |
t-test, ANOVA, Regression |
Chi-square, Mann–Whitney, Kruskal–Wallis |
|
Efficiency |
More powerful if assumptions met |
Less powerful but more flexible |
|
Use with Small Samples |
Not recommended |
Recommended |
Comments
Post a Comment